Portfolio evidence
Portfolio evidence is one of 84 measurements this engine publishes in full. It is regenerated from a real run rather than transcribed, and it is shown here with its own claim boundary so the number and its limits arrive together.
The measurement
- Public path
- /glassbox/stanford_cs_evidence_map.json
Stanford cs
- Applicant and project author
- Arhan Canli
- Content hash
- sha256:70eadf202ea25ba7f29b32dfc390aed569ac3a88f07a9e19e1235f6b6037d33b
- Schema
- canli.alphac-stanford-cs-evidence-map.v1
- Status
- FACTUAL_PORTFOLIO_EVIDENCE_NOT_AN_ADMISSIONS_CLAIM
Application ready
- Activity description characters
- 125
Activity description max 150 characters. Built ALPHAC: 228 retired legacy identities, 1 prospective trial, broker evidence, corrections, and 16 checksum-bound papers.
Memorable lesson. The project became stronger when its validation system disproved attractive results; the contribution is the machinery that makes those reversals visible.
Short description. Designed and implemented a quantitative-research and publication system spanning data engineering, statistical validation, paper execution, provenance, testing and public web interfaces. Published negative results and corrections alongside surviving hypotheses so every performance claim can be traced to evidence.
Evidence
Forward truth
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Research governance
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Scholarly objects
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Statistical judgment
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Systems and provenance
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Testing and correctness
3 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Ninety second project map
- Question: can a quantitative claim be made independently falsifiable?
- System: point-in-time inputs -> registered trial -> realistic simulation -> gate -> paper account -> signed evidence -> public paper.
- Decision quality: attractive results were corrected, killed or kept provisional when evidence failed.
- Public output: trial packets, papers, machine-readable artifacts, corrections and broker-separated paper evidence.
- Open burden: longer forward evidence, ten additional distinct sleeves, portable raw-input replay and independent review.
One sentence thesis. Arhan Canli built ALPHAC to test whether quantitative-finance claims can be made publicly falsifiable through point-in-time data, complete trial accounting, broker reconciliation, deterministic evidence and visible corrections.
Source bindings
Admission v7
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
All sleeve archives
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Broker
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Clean reproduction
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Forward
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Legacy closure
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Mutation
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Prospective trial
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Publication
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Source rights
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
Trial packets
2 further fields. Read them in the artifact.
What not to claim
- funded or client performance
- a statistically established forward Sharpe
- peer review or repository acceptance
- independent replication
- Stanford endorsement
- that automation proves Arhan's unaided personal contribution
Source binding
- Path
- artifacts/portfolio/stanford_cs_evidence_map.json
- Sha256
- 20451b2689bde904a887ee2e25bcad9cbc54f4d7355cc41d0fbeb3b348abedd3
Check it yourself
Every figure above is read from /glassbox/stanford_cs_evidence_map.json, the
artifact the engine wrote. Nothing on this page is typed by hand: the page is generated from that
file, so a figure that moves in the artifact moves here and a figure that is not in the artifact
cannot appear here at all.