Perpetual-futures funding carry, basis, venue structure and stablecoin dislocation form the sleeve family with this book's longest live record.
Perpetual futures carry a mechanism that has no equity analogue: a funding payment exchanged between longs and shorts at a fixed interval to hold the contract near spot. It is a real cash flow with a published rate. You are not inferring a premium from returns; you are paid on an observable schedule.
That clarity is also the trap. Funding carry is a liquidity-provision trade wearing a yield's clothing: it pays steadily and loses violently in exactly the cascade that makes it pay. Its return distribution is dominated by rare observations, and a Sharpe ratio computed on a calm sample says almost nothing about the risk being taken. Any honest treatment of this sleeve has to separate what it earned from what it was exposed to, and this book's own decomposition of that separation is published.
This is the sleeve family with the longest live record here, and it is also the one where the most has been killed. Dated basis, low-volatility construction, short-side time-series momentum, the variance risk premium, funding term structure and multi-venue funding differentials were each tested and each published as a null. The one construction that trades is the plain cross-sectional funding carry.
Venue structure is treated as part of the mechanism rather than as an implementation detail, because in this market it is. Funding is a venue-specific quantity, the same instrument has different rates in different places, and a research result computed on one exchange's history may not be reproducible on another's. Multi-venue collection runs daily for that reason, and the boundaries of what has actually been collected are published rather than assumed.
The crypto documents
- A hash-bound prospective test of cross-sectional perpetual-futures carryThis paper reports the first ALPHAC crypto-carry identity whose data decision, code, environment, trial parameters, and private execution inputs were frozen…
- Crypto Dated-Futures Basis (campaign): a killed candidateScreened at an apparent 1.47 but refuted 3x and reproduced from scratch: the 8.2%/yr 'carry' is a roll-accounting fiction; the kept days (+0.55) and the…
- Crypto defensive factors: positive summaries without admission evidenceThis record reconciles two cross-sectional defensive-factor identities in crypto perpetual futures: 720-hour low beta and 720-hour low realized volatility.
- Crypto Low-Volatility: a killed candidateThe STRONGEST in-sample signal the 200+-factor campaign found anywhere (Rank-IC t = 6.66). Full purged walk-forward: net Sharpe 0.69; respectable. But the…
- Crypto momentum: complete trial lineage and failed sleeve-admission evidenceAlphaForge tested cross-sectional and time-series momentum in perpetual-futures prices. Diversification without standalone edge does not earn a sleeve slot.
- Crypto multi-factor engine: seven trials, capacity decay, and no-deploy verdictAlphaForge ran a historical robustness matrix over crypto perpetual futures from 2021-01-01 through 2026-06-01. Seven charged identities belong to the broad…
- Crypto Multi-Venue Funding Aggregation (probe): a killed candidateWould aggregating funding across exchanges beat our Binance-only carry signal? This died at the screen stage, before a full walk-forward was ever run.
- Crypto perpetual carry: trial lineage, capacity failure, and live evidence boundaryAlphaForge studies cross-sectional carry in USDT-margined perpetual futures, ranking contracts by the negative trailing mean of observed funding: expensive…
- Crypto short-horizon reversal: two decisive negative trialsTwo historical identities test whether crypto perpetual-futures returns reverse after common movement is removed. One uses a 24-hour residual signal; the…
- Crypto Short-Horizon Trend (campaign): a killed candidateThe strong 0.60 screen lives entirely in the untradeable 2016-18 illiquid era; modern crypto is flat-to-dead with a catastrophic -4.88 skew (crash-day…
- Crypto Variance-Risk-Premium (campaign): a killed candidatePitched at 2.15 Sharpe; the headline was a 252-vs-365 vol-annualization error inventing a phantom 15-vol-point premium. Honest measurement: net Sharpe -0.07…
- Crypto volatility risk premium: one proxy trial and a published nullAlphaForge tested one preregistered BTC/ETH volatility-risk-premium timing rule from 2021-03-24 through 2026-06-01. It compared Deribit DVOL closes with a…
- Funding Term-Structure / Slope (campaign): a killed candidateThe decorrelated residual is noise (worked pre-2023, inverted after: +1.11 then -1.43); the only version that makes money is leaked carry-LEVEL; a…
- Stablecoin par dislocations: literature and implementation boundaryFiat-backed stablecoins have a two-tier market. A limited set of eligible institutions can transact with the issuer near par, while everyone else trades in…
- Stablecoin par dislocations: locked no-return feasibility protocolCan an eligible institution reconstruct and execute USDC secondary-to-primary redemption with point-in-time legal, operational, venue, chain, and banking…
- When Crypto Carry Became Crash Exposure: The LABUSDT IncidentAlphaForge bought LABUSDT at a paper fill of 16.150421 USDT on 5 July 2026 while its point-in-time funding signal was negative. This distinction matters.
